Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Simmons (comedian)
Appearance
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2021 January 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Only Keep !vote was predicated on article being improved, which has not happened. Yunshui 雲水 11:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mark Simmons (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not seeing enough independent coverage to meet WP:GNG nor claims that clearly meet WP:NBIO. Searching online, I was able to find some trivial coverage but nothing significant, although the presence of search results about other individuals by this name could have led to me missing something. That having been said, based on what I was able to find, I think that this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - He doesn't appear to be well-known enough to receive the reliable source coverage that we need. I agree. Merely being associated with notable comedic entities doesn't make one notable. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable comedian.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep f editors are willing to clean up the article. There is enough notability on the comedian online. As seen on google news, there is a lot of information on the comedian and a lot of them are reliable secondary sources. Edits made regarding this will showcase notability regarding WP:HEY. Mr. Apollo (talk to me bebe) 22:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- In response to the keep vote before the relist, I'm not seeing anything in the first few pages of search results that would help get this article to HEY standards. There's a lot of false positives, and the few results that are actually about this subject looked trivial/routine. signed, Rosguill talk 02:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.